Atheist God Loosens Restraint on Chinese Parents

The atheist god called "Communist Government" has slightly loosen his grip on the emotionally strained parents that lost a child in the recent Chinese earth quakes. The one child policy of China has been clarified to tolerate an additional child in the horrific case of children killed by the May 12, 2008 disaster.

While the story catches a few headlines in the U.S., I rarely encounter anyone outraged by the "one child policy". "China's one child policy was launched in the late 1970s to control China's exploding population and ensure better education and health care" states an AP article released on May 26, 2006. The reality is Americans use similar logic to justify the use of birth-control pills, abortion, and many other means of population control, though it is not a legal restriction imposed by government.

The interesting element is the contradiction to God's Word and the privilege he entrusted us with: "Be fruitful and multiply", "fill the earth and subdue it". The Lord God commands us to reproduce; to produce godly offspring. He commands us and expects us to populate the earth with His children.

Furthermore, He is the giver of rights; not the state. Many of us Americans have bought into the ideal of micro-managing the population, rather than "being fruitful" and multiplying. I know, you have all manner of rationale. You need to save money, become more stable, plan for the future, etc...

Nonetheless, government has no right or authority to limit the number of children you have. It is not the government's right to give or take away. It belongs to God. Well, unless your an atheist. I hope you see the point...

"Religion, or a lack thereof, does impact policy".

Secular Progressives and Liberals in the U.S trend toward policies similar to China's Communist government. What side of the argument do you land on? If a majority of American's supported a limit on child-bearing, would it be Constitutional?


God Save the U.S.A.

Robert Novak Doesn't Recognize the Plague

Today's GOPUSA news included an interested article from Robert Novak, "McCain, Huckabee And The Evangelicals". Novak wonders aloud if Huckabee is helping or hurting McCain, and if Huckabee really supports McCain or not. Novak suggests that Huckabee and Michael Farris view an Obama presidency as a plague that America deserves and which fulfils prophecy. You can read Novak's view for yourself on the following link. This writer disagrees with Novak.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/rnovak/2008/rdn_05121.shtml

The scary part of Novak's article is that he doesn't blast the socialist ideologies of Obama. Militant evangelicals are the apparent enemy in Novak's mind. The last I checked socialist and communist ideologies were the enemies against which American soldiers have fought upon numerous occasions. Countless American boys have given their lives fighting such governments, and now it's being welcomed at home.

Thanks to the Humanist ideologies inculcated into our public education system, many Americans now tend toward socialist policies. Many Americans stand behind the socialist ideas of Hillary and Obama, not to mention a good number of Republican policies. Apparently Novak doesn't think that to be as big of a threat as evangelicals.

My friends, do not be disillusioned. Socialism is on the rise in America. Evangelical or not, are you going to stand and fight, or welcome it in?

God Save the U.S.A.

Theocratic Demagoguery

This article is overdue. Frankly I'm bewildered on why the Religious Right allows this image to persist. Assertions of Theocratic motives, accusations, and demagoguery most often go unchallenged, and even when it's such a clear constitutional issue.

Does the Religious Right really want to establish a Christian Theocracy? Is that really their agenda?

The Darwinian Evolutionists, and a host of other groups that hate Christian fundamentalism, often make this charge. They attempt to scare people away from Christianity, asserting that Christianity is being forced upon an un-suspecting public. In the famous words of Col. Sherman T. Potter, "Horse hockey!"


I'm clearly a fundamentalist, and I would be hard pressed to find anyone that believes State Religion is the way to go. The people I know understand that freedom of religious expression is foundational to our nation. They understand that forcing people to comply with religious beliefs and certain liturgical practices only produces better hypocrites. I believe Jefferson spoke to this issue himself.


The confusion lies in the assertion of Christian morality. If a Christian asserts a moral issue in a public legal or political domain, they suddenly become a Theocrat. Non-sense! Religious systems contain more than just faith and worship practices. They also include personal moral laws, punitive and judicial laws, education laws, etc ... As does a just government. The founders knew that faith and worship practices belonged to individuals and the churches. I agree.


At the same time, morality is essential to free society. Government that does not enforce moral standards is chaotic. Let us continue to blend immorality with democracy and wait for the results.


Asserting Theocratic Demagoguery has been effective. It's time for more fundamentalist to challenge those assertions.

Ben Stein Deserves an Award

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed


This movie is long overdue, and I am very grateful that Ben Stein and Nathan Frankowski had the guts and the conviction to produce it. The movie reveals the myths, hatred, and bigotry of some contemporary Darwin disciples. Yes, all “religion” , including Darwinian Evolution and Religious Humanism have low lights in rationality and bigotry. Bigotry and bias are base human traits of which Darwinian Evolutionists are not exempt. Richard Dawkins is captured on film stating that life on earth was "seeded" by more intelligent beings from another world, not to mention his obvious biases, which we all have, and must admit.

I agree that Adaptation of the Species is scientific and observable. Origin of the Species is not. Darwin is long since dead. His simplistic view of the cell is totally outdated, and his later theory is dying rapidly. Molecular biology has demonstrated that intelligence exists inside the cell, and no one really knows how it got there. Debate and further research is required, but you may experience troubles at Iowa State, George Mason, and Baylor universities.

Stein’s main point is that a "Berlin Wall" has been erected by the Darwinian Evolutionists and the academic elite. "Intelligent Design" is taboo. Credentialed scientists are loosing their jobs and tenure. The horrors of Nazi Germany and U.S. eugenic programs are clearly attached to ardent masterminds of "Natural Selection". This wall of isolation is destroying freedom and science in America, not to mention the impact it has on morality and learning overall.

You MUST SEE this movie! Stein deserves an award, but it won’t be for peace!

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Bewilderment Among Professional Pork Spenders Association

They are professionals. They were training in the fine and brilliant institutions of the United States. Now they've made it to the top. They did their time; won their way through one bitter campaign fight after another. They are the federal decisions makers now.

They know best how to spend our money. They can spend it better than we can. They responsibly examine the needs of our nation and the world. Then they put the money right where it's needed ... so they think or claim. The American people see them more like the Professional Pork Spenders Association, not U.S. Statesmen, and they wonder in bewilderment why they have such a low approval rating.

Senator John Cornyn, R-Texas, has hit it right on the head. Dick Morris' book, Outrage, also captures this issue and many others. It's the pork! It's earmarking (among other things)!

Friends, where is the outrage? Why do we tolerate this non-sense? It's been going on for years, and it continues to be a major problem. A problem to the tune of $18.3 billion this year.

Please read Senator Cornyn's article, sign the 100,000 strong petition, and be a loud voice! Be heard! Make some noise! Help the Professional Pork Spenders Association understand why they have such a low approval rating.

Not to miss an opportunity here ... how is it that "educated" men can do these things in clear conscience? C.S. Lewis put it this way,

"Education without values ... seems to make man a more clever devil."

Without a Biblical education; With religion and morality, self-control, democracy is a dangerous form of government.

A House Divided Will Not Expand

So knew the Founders, the separation of powers was central to establishing responsible and accountable federal government...

So knew the Founders, all men are corruptible ... The individual man, a potential tyrant; The masses as a whole and groups of all sizes may be lured into corrupt schemes; The church; The body politic. All are subject to the temptation of abuse, the lure of money, access to absolute power.

So acted the Founders ... They separated; They divided. They separated the power of the church from the power of the state. They separated the judicial from the executive, and from the legislative. They separated our legislative bodies. They divided the legislature into two houses or chambers.

Yes, they separated the House from the Senate. They separated the representation of the people from the representation of the States. There were thirteen State Constitutions to protect. There were thirteen State Governments that were already operating. The States had to be represented and protected at the new federal level of government.

So knew the Founders, there was great risk of the new federal government usurping the power of the States. They created a house divided ... Divided by length of terms; Divided in numbers; Divided in accountability; Divided by means of achieving office. U.S. Senators were originally appointed by the State Legislatures.

... A House divided will not expand.

With differing interests and accountability, the House and the Senate had to work hard to achieve common agendas. They had to work hard at coming together for the common good of the people and the existing State governments. They had to unite their divided interests to establish new law or new federal agencies.

With the adoption of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1914, we the people, have destroyed a key separation of powers, the central genius of our constitution. With the Seventeenth Amendment we have removed federal accountability to state government. With the Seventeenth Amendment, we have subjected the Senate to the same multi-million dollar campaign cycles as the house. We have made them both chambers near identical targets vulnerable to corporate lobbyists and special interests. The vast distinctions between the two legislative bodies are gone... for now.

With the Senate and the House now united in power, the size of federal government as exploded. How many federal agencies existing prior to 1914? How many have been created since? There are currently over one hundred thirty listed on the White House web-site. Adding the Seventeenth Amendment paved the wave for FDRs New Deal, and its expansive growth of federal government.

My friends, the federal government is now out of control. Election of Senators by popular vote, election by the masses, is not working. We are now witnessing perhaps the most expansive and corrupt era of federal government in the history of the United States of America.

It is time to again divide the body politic. It is time to again vastly separate the powers of the legislative houses. It is time to again make the federal government accountable to the State governments.

A house divided will not expand...

Obama's Manipulation Stimulus Plan

Yesterday, Presidential hopeful, Senator Barack Obama, spoke about his plans for America's economy. The basic thrust of Obama's plan is to expand government regulations in response to the current home lending issues and excessive profit taking by corporate executives.

When a consumer and lender agree to loan terms that are risky or exploitative, who's fault is it? Could it be the consumer's fault? Is the lender's at fault? Senator Obama blames lenders and the lack of government regulations to control them.

When oil and gas companies raise prices, and consumers don't change their consumption habits, who's fault is that? When corporate profits rise, and executives go on expensive trips, while workers' salaries stay flat, whose fault is that? What needs to be done to improve these situations?

Creating more government regulations will stimulate more manipulation of the law. No sooner than new regulations hit the books, corporate lawyers will have already figured out ways to navigate around the regulatory obstacles that impede their business.

This writer advocates self regulation. Self control. Liberty under God's laws. The right laws are already on the books; the Big Book. The Old and New Testaments alike repeatedly tell us to deal fairly with one another. Do not lie, mislead, or withhold information. Do not steal, cheat or fudge the numbers. Don't exploit another person. Don't charge excessive usury. Don't use unjust scales. It's all in the Book of God's Law, and there are already plenty of laws on the federal books as well.

More regulations won't change a nation that doesn't accept moral standards. What America needs is a change of heart. America needs a re-assertion of Godly influence.

If you want to blame someone or something, what about the thinking of Secular Humanist and modern philosophers that have helped establish moral relativism as they've corrupted and infiltrated our education system? If you want to blame someone, consider parents that have failed to teach the commands of God to their children. If you want to blame someone, what about consumers that have forgotten that spending habits are theirs to control? If you want to blame something, what about the countless federal regulations that are already on the books? If you want to blame someone, maybe we should consider the churches lack of influence on justice and morality?

My friend, more government regulations will stimulate more manipulation of the law. To the increase of wickedness, there is no end. Man is always inventing new ways to do evil. It's time for us to turn back to the morality of God and the Bible. It's time to teach our sons and daughters the righteousness of God; to love by His commands. Then, when Americans again demand righteousness and goodness, God will heal our land. Godly ways are our political hope!

God Save the U.S.A.